Peeping Tom or child porn?
The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that a man taking a picture up the inside of a 16-year-old girl’s skirt in public is not illegal. How is this even possible? Apparently he was charged as a Peeping Tom - and apparently that law only applies to places where someone can reasonably claim privacy - their home, the bathroom, etc. Okay, okay, fine. But what about taking pictures of a 16-year-old’s vagina? Last time I checked that was illegal regardless of whether the 16-year-old knew about it or not!
March 14th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
It seems like one has a reasonable expectation of privacy about one’s, well, privates.
A couple of states, NY I think is one, is trying to fix the loophole.
Which is stupid, because it’s only a loophole if you want it to be. Give this guy a jury trial and he’s in the pen for sure. grumble grumble